Algow Wildfire is a free platform that tracks active fires in Türkiye and its immediate surroundings using satellite data, and shows the likely direction of spread given the wind. The aim is simple: anyone, without technical knowledge, should be able to see at a glance where fires are and which way they might advance. It was built for the public good; it carries no advertising and sells no data.
Where does the data come from?
Fire detections come from the VIIRS and MODIS satellite sensors via NASA's FIRMS system. These satellites scan each region a few times a day; a detection is the heat anomaly the satellite saw at that moment. So the map is not instantaneous like a security camera: detections land with a delay of one to four hours, depending on when the satellite passed over. The "last detection" badge at the top exists precisely for that honesty — you can see at any moment how fresh the data is. Small fires, or fires under cloud, may not appear at all; a point missing from the map is not a guarantee that there is no fire there.
To close that gap in part we use a second source: Meteosat, Europe's weather satellite. Because it turns with the Earth it sees Türkiye continuously and scans every ten minutes; the data reaches us within roughly half an hour. Since August 2026 we have been using the new-generation Meteosat Third Generation product: when we measured it, a single pixel covers about two square kilometresover our country. In the previous generation that was fifteen to twenty-five square kilometres — so the location of a fire is now roughly ten times more precise. Even so, because this is an area and not a point, we draw those detections as an orange ring showing the pixel's real size — the fire is somewhere inside that ring, not exactly at its centre. It still cannot see small fires. In short, Meteosat does not replace the high-resolution satellites; it fills the blind hours between them. If the new product is unreachable, it falls back to the previous generation on its own.
Wind, humidity, temperature and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) come from Open-Meteo's open weather models. The particles flowing across the map show the current wind field; when you click a fire, the panel that opens summarises the fire weather of that area. The same panel carries the Fire Weather Index, which describes how dry the fuel is, the particulate measurement that traces smoke in the air, and the slope information that tells you where flames could climb.
All times on this site are Türkiye time (UTC+3), in 24-hour format. They are deliberately not converted to your own time zone: "the fire started at 03:00" should mean the same thing here as it does on the ground.
Not every dot on this map is a fire
This has to be said plainly: a satellite does not see flames, it sees heat. The sensor flags every point on the surface that is markedly hotter than its surroundings. A forest fire is the most striking of those, but not the only one. The stacks of refineries and petrochemical plants, gas flares, thermal power stations, steel and cement works and waste incinerators keep showing up at the same point day and night. Post-harvest stubble burning also fills the map with small dots, especially in July and August. If you rewind the time slider and a dot appears in the same place at the same intensity every day, what is there is most likely not a fire but a permanent heat source.
Errors run the other way too. Fires under cloud, advancing beneath tree cover, or falling between satellite passes may not appear at all. Because the sensor works at low resolution, a few hundred metres of positional error is normal; the dot at the centre of a detection marks the centre of that pixel, not the exact location of the flame. Hot bare rock and sun glint occasionally produce false detections as well.
In short, this map is a clue and a situational-awareness tool; it does not replace observation on the ground, official statements, or the forest service. A point appearing here does not prove there is a fire there, and its absence does not show that there is not.
How many fires do we actually see? (we measured it)
The sentence above — "we may miss fires" — stayed qualitative for a long time: we did not know how many we were missing. Now we have measured it. We deliberately used an independent reference rather than our own data: the burnt-area maps that the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) derives from satellite imagery. That distinction matters, because burnt area and active fire are two different measurements: a burn scar stays on the ground even if no satellite happened to look while the flames were burning. So we are not grading ourselves with our own ruler.
For the 2025 season in Türkiye we checked how many of the 351 fires larger than 30 hectares recorded by EFFIS produced at least one detection in our pipeline:
- Above 1,000 hectares: 100% (25 out of 25)
- 500–1,000 hectares: 91%
- 100–500 hectares: 80%
- 30–100 hectares: 78%
Overall we catch 81% of fires above 30 hectares. Treat that as a lower bound: for some of the apparent misses we do have detections, but they sit a few days away from the date EFFIS recorded — a burn scar only becomes visible in imagery after the fire has burned. Allowing for that date uncertainty the figure rises to 86%, and ignoring dates entirely it reaches 91%. The true value lies in that range.
What this does not say matters more: below 30 hectares we can offer no assurance. EFFIS has its own minimum mapping size, so small fires fall outside this measurement, and the evidence we do have points the other way — two fires in grass and scrub near Dikili, put out quickly, were never seen by our system at all. The measurement covers a single season (2025). In short: reliable for large fires, not for small ones.
How does the direction forecast work, and what does it not promise?
The blue shape around a fire starts from the leading edge seen on the last satellite pass and shows the likely direction of spread and, at a rough rate, the one, three and six hour reach. The direction is computed from the resultant of wind and terrain slope (the vector sum of the Rothermel wind and slope coefficients; the fuel is assumed to be Mediterranean maquis). On flat ground the slope term approaches zero on its own; on a steep slope it pulls the shape uphill. Fuel moisture and firefighting response are not accounted for.
Here is the part that most deserves honesty: we ran a backtest against our own data. Six fire seasons (2021–2026), 468 thousand satellite detections, 232 measurable advances from 79 fires in forest and maquis. For each one we compared the forecast at one pass with the direction the fire actually grew in on the next pass.
The result: the forecast is better than random, but not certain. The median angular error is 68° (random expectation is 90°); 33% of forecasts land within 45° (25% at random), and 16%point the completely wrong way (25% at random). This page previously said, on the basis of twenty-three samples, that the forecast was "no better than random"; that sample was small enough to have misled us — we corrected it. Taking slope into account markedly reduces the worst error on steep ground (over 15%): the rate of completely reversed forecasts falls from 22% to 11%.
We also measured the size of the shape for the first time, and here we had been seriously wrong. The old rings rested on no measurement at all and were several times the truth — we drew the 3-hour ring at 7.6 km, whereas the fires we measured advanced far less than that from their own edge in the same time. The rings were shrunk to match the measurement and now have a clear, testable meaning: "in nine out of ten fires, even the furthest advancing point stayed inside this boundary". We tested that rate on seasons the model had never seen — holding each season out in turn, tuning on the rest and measuring on the one left out; the average came to 90%. Our first attempt only reached 81%, so we enlarged the rings accordingly. In the same way the angle of the shape, at 15–30°, was too narrow and too confident; it covered only 30% of the observed deviations. The angle now comes from the measured distribution too — when the wind is weak the direction is nearly undetermined, so the shape widens, and when it is very uncertain a disc is drawn instead of a wedge: so as not to imply a precision we do not have.
We measured the ceiling as well: even if the actual mean wind between two passes were known in advance, the median error would only fall to 64°. So the remaining error does not come from the wind forecast but from firefighting response and the detail of terrain and fuel — no forecast shape can close that uncertainty. One more finding: the direction observed on a fire's previous pass is a poor predictor of its next step (median error 99°, worse than random) — because once the advancing head is suppressed, the fire keeps burning at the flanks and to the rear. That is why we do not extend the white trail forwards.
For that reason we present the shape not as a prophecy but as the statement "wind and terrain point this way right now". The white trail, which shows where the fire has actually advanced over the last few hours, rests on observation and is more reliable; when the two diverge, go by the observed direction. Under no circumstances is this shape a tool for evacuation decisions.
This site is not an official warning system. If you see a fire or you are in danger, call without losing time:
112 Emergency·177 Forest fire hotline
Those who fell protecting the forests
23 July 2025, Seyitgazi in Eskişehir. The crew working the fire was caught between the flames when the wind turned. Five forest workers and five AKUT search-and-rescue volunteers fell. Across that season's forest fires in Türkiye 17 lives were given; there were also those who fell in the line of duty in İzmir Ödemiş, in Bursa and in Osmaniye. In Turkish they are called şehit — the word this country reserves for those who die serving it.
They walked toward what everyone else runs from. On a fire line a wind shift is a matter of seconds, and it can close the way back at once. That is what happened at Seyitgazi. We remember them with respect and gratitude.
The cone on this site measures exactly one thing: where the wind is carrying the fire. That is why this page states plainly how honestly we can measure it and where we get it wrong — overstating a forecast means somebody in the field trusting the wrong thing.
This platform is not an official operational tool and does not reach the crews on the ground. We make no claim to make their work easier. We simply work knowing the price paid by the people who protect this country's forests.
Your location and your privacy
With the "My location" button in the top bar you can see yourself on the map and read how many kilometres away, and in which direction, the nearest fire is. Your location is processed on your own device only; it is not sent to us or to any other server, and it is not stored. You can switch it off at any time with the same button. The site does not track visitors, use cookies, or carry advertising.
Open source
The source code of this platform is open under AGPL-3.0. You may inspect it, run it and add new features on top of it; we would like you to. There is one condition: if you make your version available to others, you have to leave its source open too. That way the project stays in everyone's hands and nobody can release a closed copy of it. The Algow name and visual identity are outside this licence; give your own version your own name.
Release notes
We write down here what we changed and when — especially when we are correcting our own mistake.
6 August 2026 — we answered "how many fires do we miss?" with a number for the first time
- Detection completeness measured — against an independent source. Until now we said "we may miss small fires" without knowing how many. We compared against EFFIS burnt-area maps: we catch every fire above 1,000 hectares and 81% of those above 30 hectares. Because burnt area and active fire are two different measurements, this is not us grading ourselves with our own ruler. Added as the "How many fires do we actually see?" section above.
- We corrected the measurement twice, and both corrections changed the answer. The first figure was 73% — then we realised we had measured using only two of the four satellite sources the site actually uses. Adding the missing two gave 81%. Second: the date EFFIS records is systematically late, because a burn scar only appears in imagery after the fire has burned, which makes it easy to think we missed something.
- Three improvement ideas were tried; none held, and nothing on the map changed. We wanted to add Landsat as a second verification source — we measured it, and that product does not cover Türkiye at all. We tried tuning the cone radius by fuel type; forest and scrub already want the same setting. And we tried machine learning for direction once more, this time only on "clean" fires: it briefly looked like it worked, until a deliberately meaningless filter produced the same apparent gain, which showed the effect was not real. None of the three shipped.
5 August 2026 — we retested the "nine out of ten" claim against ten times the data; this time it held
- The coverage claim was independently confirmed. The site says "nine out of ten of the cells the fire advanced into stay inside the shape we draw". That claim turned out to be wrong once before (see the 2 August note), so we tested it again — this time not with 232 cases from Türkiye but with 2,383 cases and 41,103 cells from eight seasons across the Mediterranean basin. Result: 90.4% overall, 89.1% for Türkiye alone. When we picked the setting from data outside Türkiye — never seeing Türkiye at all — and then tested it there, we still got 89%, so the figure is not luck specific to one country. Holding out each season in turn gives 90% on average.
- We tried to shrink the cone, found no meaningful way, and chose to change nothing. Three separate routes to a narrower cone at the same reliability were tested: varying the safety margin with wind speed, letting the fire correct itself from its own previously observed advance, and predicting "this fire will not grow". Each gained only about 3% on its own, and combining them did not add up — they all trim the same excess. We did not break something that works for a gain smaller than our measurement uncertainty.
- Machine learning did not beat the physics model at predicting direction. We trained a model on eight seasons of data. In the geography it was trained on it was a few degrees better than the physics model, but in Türkiye the difference vanished into noise. We write this down because saying "we added AI" is easy and saying it did not work is hard.
- Nothing changed on the map in this round. The work was measuring and verifying.
4 August 2026 — a new satellite, pixel honesty, and a failure we had been silent about
- The reach shape now changes with the wind — and our earlier measurement was broken. We drew the shape as "2.4 times longer ahead than behind", the same at every wind speed. When we measured that number we took the fire's direction from its centre of mass; in a 30-kilometre fire, the direction that looks "backwards" from the centre can be the flank of the front. We redid it per 375-metre cell, each cell measured from its own nearest burnt neighbour (5,719 cells): in light wind a fire really does advance almost equally in every direction (1.2×, nearly a circle), while above 15 km/h it barely moves backwards at all (5.5×). One fixed shape got both wrong. The new shape both covers more (88% → 91%) and is smaller — in strong wind the area we draw shrank by a third, because we no longer spend it on the side the fire does not go.
- A "Clean" button, and information bands you can dismiss. Clean view hides the top strip, the list on the left, the legend and the data-source notes, leaving just the map — for screenshots, or simply for looking at the map. The small handle at the top right, or ESC, brings it all back. Each information band at the top now also has an × of its own, so you can dismiss the ones you have read; on a phone that gives the map noticeably more room. One exception is the unverified heat source warning: dismissing it applies only to that alert, and it returns when the satellite sees a new source. We did not want the site's earliest warning to be silenced for good. In clean view the Algow signature sits at the bottom left and a very faint yangin.algow.net watermark covers the map: the platform is free and open source, but its imagery should not be sold on as someone else's work.
- Heat sources in Syria and Iraq moved to the bottom of the list. Our satellite window also covers neighbouring countries, and most of the large power readings there are not fires: it is gas flared at oil wells, industrial heat that never goes out. A 1,171-megawatt flare near Mosul was pushing a real 512-megawatt forest fire in Çankırı down the list. We did not remove them from the map — we show what the satellite sees — but they now sort last. Greece and the Balkans are excluded from this: a large fire there is a real fire.
- Fire weather had been broken for months in Greece and the Balkans — now fixed. When we widened the map westwards we had written the boundary by hand in six separate places and forgot to update five of them. For every fire west of 24.9° east, wind, humidity, fire weather index, smoke forecast, slope and fuel type came back silently empty. Nothing errored, so it simply looked like "no data". Some of the largest fires on the map were in exactly that area. The boundary now lives in one place and a test stops it being copied again.
- We now draw the satellite pixel at its real size. Zoom in and each detection gets a dashed ellipse around it: that is the cell the heat sits inside. The dot does not mean "the fire is exactly here". On VIIRS the cell is 375 m at best; on MODIS it grows to 4 km at the edge of the swath — so you can now see why a position sometimes looks off.
- The active fire count dropped a little, because it used to be slightly inflated. Every detection carries a confidence flag and we were ignoring it. Low-confidence daytime detections are now drawn faint and left out of the counter. Daytime false alarms are mostly sun glint: greenhouse sheeting, metal roofs, water. At night that mechanism does not exist, so night detections are not downgraded — fires grow at night too.
- A new satellite: Sentinel-3. Europe's SLSTR adds about four passes a day at 1 km. Sharper than Meteosat but slower: we measured roughly two hours from sensing to publication. So it does not close the blind gap, it adds another pass to the sharp layer. It also reports its own error margin, which is why we can say "30 ± 4 MW".
- We say so when the sensor saturates. In a very intense fire the satellite's heat channel saturates and the power it reports becomes a lower bound. The card then reads "VERY INTENSE": the figure shown is the smallest the fire could be.
- Where a fire is heading is now written out, not just drawn. The projected reach was already on the map but stayed abstract for anyone not looking at it. It now reads "in this direction: X ~7 km". This is not an evacuation warning and does not mean the fire will get there — wind turns and crews intervene.
- Smoke: a measurement when there is one, the model otherwise. Until now the smoke line was entirely model output (ECMWF/CAMS) and we never said so. If a ground station within 25 km of the fire is reporting, its real value now appears on its own line. To be honest about it: in Türkiye that line will usually be missing, because the national air quality network's open feed stopped in May 2023 — of 406 registered stations only 8 still report and all of them are in Istanbul. It works in Greece and the rest of Europe. When there is no station, the line below says the figure is model output only.
- Sharing a link now shows our opening screen. The preview card in chat apps and social media is the same screen you see when the site opens. And for search engines and browsers without JavaScript, the page summary now comes from the server: the age of the newest detection, the number of active events and the emergency numbers stay readable even if the map never loads.
3 August 2026 — Greece now covered, firefighting aircraft on the map
- The area the map covers now extends further west. Previously we only saw Greece's Aegean coast and its eastern islands; the western mainland, the Peloponnese, the Ionian islands and the south of Crete were outside the box entirely. On the first day of the wider coverage the largest fire there measured 2,645 MW — twice the size of the largest fire we had ever recorded in Türkiye. Fires in neighbouring countries carry an "ABROAD" badge and are excluded from the Türkiye counter.
- The event list is now ordered by fire size. Cross-border fires used to be pushed to the bottom unconditionally. Once coverage widened, that rule started hiding information: 1,230 MW was burning at Corinth while a 182 MW fire sat at the top of the list. Which country a fire is in is now told by the badge on the card, not by its position.
- A new layer shows the aircraft and helicopters working a fire. The source is an open ADS-B network run by volunteers. We genuinely know the aircraft type and registration; we do not know its mission — so read this layer as "there is a response here", not as an official tasking record. An absent aircraft does not mean there is no response either: not every aircraft broadcasts, and coverage is weak over mountains. It is not counted as an active fire.
- Our own mistake: part of the wind map was silently coming up empty. Widening the coverage pushed us past the per-minute limit of the service we get wind data from, and the northern part of the grid could not be filled. That matters, because a fire with no wind data gets no spread forecast either — people were seeing an incomplete map without knowing why. We made the grid slightly coarser; the whole coverage now fills. The cost is about 11 degrees of extra coarseness in the direction calculation, which is well inside the forecast's own margin of error, so it is the right trade.
3 August 2026 — the fire we missed, news reports, first alarm
- On 2 August we failed to show you the fire at Bayramiç — even though we had seen it. The high-resolution satellites (VIIRS/MODIS) never saw it: the fire started and was contained between their passes. The geostationary Meteosat saw it at 16:08 local time, 91 minutes before the first news report, peaking at 303 MW. But that detection was only a temporary orange ring on the map: it never entered the fire list, was not counted, raised no alert, and vanished once the fire died down. We had the information and did not tell you.
- First alarm added. Heat sources that Meteosat can see but a high-resolution satellite has not yet confirmed are now called out above the map. They are unconfirmed and are not counted as active fires; known industrial sources are excluded. Clicking a Meteosat ring now says "possible fire in this area" and explains what remains uncertain.
- News report layer added. For the small, short-lived fires satellites cannot see, news is now watched as a second channel. These are unverified reports: they are drawn as an approximate area rather than a point, and are not counted as active fires. Clicking a circle shows which report it rests on, how many outlets carried it, and whether the fire has been contained.
- The Bayramiç fire has been added to the archive — the only record there built entirely from Meteosat detections, because no other satellite left a trace of it.
2 August 2026 — English language support
- The whole platform is now available in English. The map, the fire panel, the province pages, the season statistics and the archive all have an English version under /en. Turkish addresses did not change: every link that was shared before still works. Place names stay Turkish in both languages — a name is an identity, and translating it would break the link between the map and what people say on the ground.
2 August 2026 — permanent heat sources, province pages, sharing
- We stopped counting industrial facilities as fires — our counter was inflated. A satellite sees heat, not flames; refineries, steel plants and power stations are hot every day. We were counting those as "active fires". We measured it: there are 50 places seen hot on more than 40 separate daysat the same point. For comparison, the longest measured forest fire in Türkiye lasted 16.5 days. Those points stay on the map but are now marked as a "fixed source" and left out of the fire count. That is why the figure in the header dropped — the old one was wrong, the new one is right.
- A separate page was opened for each of the 81 provinces. Every province page carries that province's season data: how many detections, how it compares with past seasons, when and where the peak heat was measured. Permanent heat sources are subtracted from those numbers — otherwise the figure in industrial regions comes out many times higher than the truth.
- Fires can now be shared. When you select a fire and send its link, the other side sees that fire directly; in chat apps the place name, radiative power and duration appear too. The numbers on the card are not written into the link — they are produced from real data each time, so that a fabricated card cannot be made.
- A smoke forecast was added. We show when the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air at the fire's location will peak over the next 48 hours. We do not compute the dispersion ourselves; we relay the output of CAMS, Europe's atmosphere monitoring service.
- An archive of past fires was opened. The 2021 Manavgat, Marmaris and Milas fires can be replayed from beginning to end. The forecast shape is deliberately not drawn in the archive: we do not present a forecast that was never made that day as if it had been.
- Fires on agricultural land can be hidden, and a province / district search arrived. Detections whose land cover is agricultural drop out of the list and the map with one button. Events whose cover could not be queried are not hidden, and how many of them there are is written out — a silently cleaned map would be misleading.
- The reach shape is drawn at close zoom. At the country view the shape was only a few pixels; even when drawn it could not be read and just left a smudge. It now appears as you approach a fire, and the reason it is not shown is written out. The outermost 6-hour boundary was also made distinct — that was the line that most needed reading, yet it was the faintest.
- The area the satellite saw as hot is shown. In hectares. This is not an official burnt area: smouldering sections lose their heat signature, and a detected pixel may not have burned in full. We named it accordingly.
2 August 2026 — Cyprus and visuals
- Place names were set to Turkish and the TRNC boundary was added. Although this was a Turkish product, the map showed names in the local language — Greek in Cyprus, English for the country name. It now reads Lefkoşa, Girne, Gazimağusa, Larnaka, Baf and Türkiye. The TRNC land boundary is drawn as well; the island had looked like a single piece.
- The "growing" label was tested, failed, and its wording was corrected. The trend label on the fire card read like a forecast. We measured it over 820 advances: its discriminating power is a coin flip (AUC 0.502). A fire labelled "growing" does not advance more than one labelled "receding"; what is more, risen heat usually falls back. The label now says what it is: heat rose / heat fell — a description of the past, not a forecast of the future.
- The promotional screenshots were refreshed. The screenshots on the project page at algow.net were updated to this version; the new reach shape, the terrain layer and the honesty notices are visible. The previous version's images were not deleted and remain accessible in the archive.
2 August 2026 — audit
- Province boundaries are now complete. The basemap's province boundaries arrived broken and in some regions were not drawn at all. We now draw the boundaries from our own data (Natural Earth, public domain) — 81 provinces, complete at every zoom. To keep the first load quick, they are fetched after the map settles.
- Regression tests were added to the direction calculation. The direction of the shape is now a multi-layered computation; a single sign error in it could have reversed the shape without visibly breaking anything. 25 tests were added, and we verified that they really catch it by injecting a deliberate error.
- We tested our own claim, it came out wrong, and we fixed it. We had tuned the "90%" threshold of the rings on the same data we measured it with — that is, the claim was confirming itself. Holding each season out in turn and testing on it showed that the ring covered a fire's furthest point only 81% of the time. The rings were enlarged; with the new setting, coverage on unseen seasons is 90%.
2 August 2026 — map pass
- Topography was added. The "Terrain" button turns on hillshading: valleys, ridges and slope aspects become visible. Since half of fire behaviour is terrain, this also makes it readable why the shape leans the way it does.
- The satellite basemap was renewed, and a daily image arrived. The previous basemap was a mosaic that could be years old. In its place came Sentinel-2 cloudless (10 m, cloud-free). In addition, the "Today" button opens NASA GIBS daily true colour imagery — the resolution is coarse (250 m) but the date is today, so smoke from large fires can be seen.
- Doubled city names were fixed. The setting we used to show labels at an early zoom was opening city layers that should exclude one another at the same time; the same city was written twice.
2 August 2026 — second pass
- The reach shape was measured: it is a teardrop now, not a circle. We measured the question "how far did fires advance in directions deviating by so much from the forecast direction?". Fires travel 2.4 times further ahead than behind. A symmetric circle threw that information away; the shape now draws the measured envelope, and the arrow at its tip makes the lean readable.
- The rings are drawn with hourly forecast wind. Previously it was assumed that "the current wind holds for six hours". Each ring now uses the wind of its own hour; if the wind turns, the outer rings bend accordingly and the panel says by how many degrees.
- Land cover is shown. The CORINE land class of the selected fire is written out. Stubble burning on agricultural land is now marked as "not a forest fire".
- Satellite observation gap warning. Pass windows are measured from the data itself. If we are in a gap it says so in the top bar and in the panel: no detection does not mean the fire is out.
2 August 2026
- The size of the shape was measured and reduced. Until now the radius of the rings rested on no measurement and was 8–12 times the truth. We measured it with six seasons of data: we were drawing the 3-hour ring at 7.6 km, while 90% of fires had advanced less than 2.5 km from their own edge in that time. The rings were pulled back to that measurement.
- The angle of the shape reflects the real uncertainty. The old narrow 15–30° wedge covered only 30% of the observed deviations. The angle now comes from the measured distribution; when the wind is weak the direction is nearly undetermined, so a disc is drawn instead of a wedge.
- Terrain slope was added to the direction forecast. The direction is now the resultant of wind and slope. On steep ground the rate of completely reversed forecasts fell from 22% to 11%.
- The validation was redone and our old verdict corrected. This page used to say, on the basis of twenty-three samples, that "the forecast is no better than random". Repeating it with six seasons and 468 thousand detections showed that to be a small-sample error.
1 August 2026
- The Meteosat 15-minute layer was added; the observation gap fell from 5 hours to about 35 minutes.
- The fire weather index (FWI), smoke (PM2.5), terrain slope, burnt area and danger layers were added.
- Fire alerts near me were added — saved places never leave the device.
- The platform went live; the source code was opened.
Attributions
Fire data: NASA FIRMS (Fire Information for Resource Management System), VIIRS and MODIS products. Weather data: Open-Meteo (CC BY 4.0). Basemap: © CARTO · © OpenStreetMap contributors. Satellite imagery: Sentinel-2 cloudless (EOX IT Services, contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data). Daily imagery: NASA EOSDIS GIBS, VIIRS/NOAA-20 true colour. Terrain elevation: Mapzen/AWS Terrain Tiles (SRTM, ASTER). NASA has not endorsed or supported the content of this platform; the data is presented as is.